电池性能全面测试,smc,格式, CNHL等电池到手小测,
本帖最后由 plpp 于 21-11-11 17:07 编辑一对新到手,标称8000mah。实测一块7668,一块8161,容差500mah,什么水平?大家看看
http://image.rcfans.com/pic/20211107/1636296372094164_115.jpg?x-oss-process=image/watermark,image_cGljLzIwMjExMDA2L29zc18xNjMzNTM0ODIxOTgzXzg2NF81MzNfNTYucG5n,t_50,g_se,x_20,y_20
http://image.rcfans.com/pic/20211107/1636296372095478_331.jpg?x-oss-process=image/watermark,image_cGljLzIwMjExMDA2L29zc18xNjMzNTM0ODIxOTgzXzg2NF81MzNfNTYucG5n,t_50,g_se,x_20,y_20
http://image.rcfans.com/pic/20211107/1636296372323277_306.jpg?x-oss-process=image/watermark,image_cGljLzIwMjExMDA2L29zc18xNjMzNTM0ODIxOTgzXzg2NF81MzNfNTYucG5n,t_50,g_se,x_20,y_20
http://image.rcfans.com/pic/20211107/1636296372422825_624.jpg?x-oss-process=image/watermark,image_cGljLzIwMjExMDA2L29zc18xNjMzNTM0ODIxOTgzXzg2NF81MzNfNTYucG5n,t_50,g_se,x_20,y_20
http://image.rcfans.com/pic/20211107/1636296372550329_823.jpg?x-oss-process=image/watermark,image_cGljLzIwMjExMDA2L29zc18xNjMzNTM0ODIxOTgzXzg2NF81MzNfNTYucG5n,t_50,g_se,x_20,y_20
http://image.rcfans.com/pic/20211107/1636296372680458_221.jpg?x-oss-process=image/watermark,image_cGljLzIwMjExMDA2L29zc18xNjMzNTM0ODIxOTgzXzg2NF81MzNfNTYucG5n,t_50,g_se,x_20,y_20
这件小事勾起了我对电池现状的兴趣,各种搜搜看看,陆续吧一些有用的信息发给大家看看。
转一个有意思的帖子,rcgroups相对全面的电池评测文章(有格式/smc、CNHL等):
https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/ ... ad-Test-Comparisons
老外的论坛还是比较有意思的,开篇
”Lipo marketing is dominated by performance claims ranging from ludicrous to criminal creating a climate which rewards liars and penalizes truth tellers.“
”Lipo 营销以从荒谬到犯罪的表现主张为主,创造了一种奖励说谎者和惩罚说真话者的氛围。“
哈哈,广而告之下 各种扯皮,说先寄回去检测喽...
至于检测标准,是否按照之前客服答复的超过50mah容差就属于质量问题,始终不答复;
估计厂家咋说就咋对吧:'( plpp 发表于 21-11-11 16:55
各种扯皮,说先寄回去检测喽...
至于检测标准,是否按照之前客服答复的超过50mah容差就属于质量问题,始终 ...
转一个有意思的帖子,rcgroups相对全面的电池评测文章(有格式/smc、CNHL等):
https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?1767093-Battery-Load-Test-Comparisons
过i外的论坛还是比较有意思的,开篇
”Lipo marketing is dominated by performance claims ranging from ludicrous to criminal creating a climate which rewards liars and penalizes truth tellers.“
”Lipo 营销以从荒谬到犯罪的表现主张为主,创造了一种奖励说谎者和惩罚说真话者的氛围。“ plpp 发表于 21-11-11 17:00
转一个有意思的帖子,rcgroups相对全面的电池评测文章(有格式/smc、CNHL等):
https://www.rcgroups.c ...
6000-9700 mAh 175A 负载测试结果
https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/attachmentNew.php?attachmentid=15403035 从测试结果看SMC貌似还不错嘛;
不过发现一个有意思的事情,同样的电池(比如8000mah按SMC的标准都是394PF)
车用的标称在咱们这是120C,而在那边标注的仅仅是20C!仅仅是20C!仅仅是20C!
重要的事情说三遍。 前面是价格,重量(都是6s的),然后是用175A放到对应电压坚持的时间,然后是电量… 嗯,速度快
对“暴力”使用的场景(也就是贵电池的主要价值点)验证很有效。
多说一句,看了smc的美国官网,他们的pf也是一类的概念,大电流放电5s,电压多少就是多少pf 我也测试了一下 cnhl就是废物一个4s 满电16.8 450a直接调到10v 还卖五百多块钱一块 4s
http://image.rcfans.com/pic/20220826/1661452640331309_492.jpg?x-oss-process=image/watermark,image_cGljLzIwMjExMDA2L29zc18xNjMzNTM0ODIxOTgzXzg2NF81MzNfNTYucG5n,t_50,g_se,x_20,y_20 电池的成本很低的,品牌溢价太高了,
页:
[1]